This article introduces RISC-V, covering essential concepts to help you get started and guiding you toward deeper exploration. It covers the basic architecture, the business and technical benefits, the potential market disruption, a competitive comparison with ARM, and RISC-V’s readiness for and barriers to adoption.
Introduction to RISC-V
The semiconductor industry is constantly evolving, driven by innovation and technological advancement. One particularly transformative development in recent years is RISC-V, an open-source Instruction Set Architecture (ISA). RISC-V has rapidly emerged as a significant alternative to established proprietary architectures such as ARM and x86, reshaping the semiconductor landscape with its compelling benefits and customisation capabilities.
What is RISC-V?
RISC-V, pronounced “risk-five”, is an open-source ISA initially developed at the University of California, Berkeley. As a fifth-generation Reduced Instruction Set Computing (RISC) architecture, it offers simplified, modular instructions to streamline processor efficiency. Unlike proprietary ISAs, RISC-V eliminates licensing fees, enabling widespread adoption and innovation across diverse industries.
Figure 1: Simplified RISC‑V processor pipeline highlighting instruction fetch (IF), decode (ID), execute (EX), memory access (MEM), and write-back (WB) stages. (Source: CIDR UP-MicroLab)
RISC-V International (RVI) manages the architecture, which has attracted significant attention. By 2022, more than 10 billion chips incorporating RISC-V cores had already been shipped.
Why RISC-V is Important
The importance of RISC-V lies in its open-source model, which promotes collaborative innovation and democratises processor design. Companies of all sizes, from startups to multinational corporations, benefit from reduced entry barriers and enhanced customisation capabilities. This accelerates product development and facilitates diverse, tailored solutions across applications ranging from embedded systems to high-performance computing.
Key Advantages Over Legacy Architectures
Open-Source and Royalty-Free
RISC-V is open-source, unlike proprietary ISAs such as ARM and x86, eliminating costly licensing fees. This financial advantage significantly lowers entry barriers, mainly benefiting startups and SMEs. The lack of royalty fees reduces costs per chip, lowering supply chain costs.
Customisability and Modularity
RISC-V allows engineers to select and incorporate only the necessary instruction set features. This modular approach optimises performance, power consumption, and chip area specifically for targeted applications.
Enhanced Security
Open-source transparency facilitates thorough public security audits, enhancing trust and reliability in processor designs. RISC-V’s modularity allows the addition of tailored security extensions, providing robust protection against vulnerabilities.
Scalability
RISC-V supports scalability across various applications, from low-power IoT microcontrollers to high-performance data centre processors. Its adaptable design allows developers to optimise for performance, power, and cost depending on the end use.
Intel’s legacy x86 architecture delivers high computational performance but offers limited flexibility due to its proprietary nature. ARM performs well for mobile and embedded applications, yet licensing constraints limit customisation. RISC-V, by contrast, stands out with its modular, open-source framework, enabling extensive customisation. This freedom empowers designers to scale processor architectures efficiently across diverse domains, from embedded systems to HPC workloads.
RISC-V Will Disrupt the Current Market
RISC-V is strategically positioned to challenge ARM’s dominance in the embedded and mobile markets through:
- Cost Advantage: Eliminating licensing fees significantly reduces overall product development costs.
- Rapid Innovation: The open ecosystem enables quicker hardware design iterations and product innovation cycles.
- Geopolitical Neutrality: With rising geopolitical tensions, RISC-V offers a neutral, globally accessible technology base.
- Broader Market Participation: Lower barriers empower smaller companies to innovate, diversifying competition.
The RISC-V allows a straightforward pipeline structure with fixed-length instructions that simplify fetching and decoding, reducing latency and enabling faster write-back operations. ARM’s pipeline can handle variable-length instructions, supporting broader operation sets, but this increases decoding complexity and slows execution stages. Additionally, while RISC-V supports complete custom extensions due to its open nature, ARM requires licensing to integrate proprietary features, limiting design freedom for specialised applications.
This figure illustrates the evolution of BOOM (Berkeley Out-of-Order Machine) cores, designed for high-performance RISC-V implementations.
Figure 2: RISC-V pipeline development using BOOM cores (Source: University of California via Elektor Magazine)
Used for educational reference and comparative engineering analysis.
- BOOMv1 introduces a basic branch prediction model with a 7-cycle penalty on mispredictions.
- BOOMv2 improves this with GShare branch prediction and additional decode/issue stages, cutting load-use latency to 4 cycles.
- BOOMv3 integrates advanced predictors such as TAGE, RAS, and uBTB, plus a Custom RoCC Accelerator, further reducing latency and improving parallel execution.
These enhancements demonstrate how RISC-V enables open-ended innovation in processor design, providing customisation opportunities not available in proprietary architectures.
Major Challenges and Barriers
Verification and Compliance Complexity
RISC-V’s flexible ISA enables innovation but also introduces verification burdens. Ensuring reliable functionality across custom implementations demands advanced methodologies, specialised tools, and highly skilled teams.
Standardisation and Compliance
The openness of RISC-V leads to variations in implementation. Without robust compliance standards, ecosystem fragmentation can occur. RISC-V International’s ongoing efforts are essential for establishing shared metrics, best practices, and certification pathways.
Software Ecosystem Maturity
While ARM boasts a well-established software stack, the RISC-V ecosystem is just developing. Gaps in toolchains, drivers, and middleware can slow adoption. Accelerating commercial and community-driven development is key to ecosystem maturity.
Intellectual Property Management
Open-source fosters collaboration, but managing IP in shared environments remains complex. Clear licensing models, IP governance frameworks, and legal safeguards are crucial to protecting innovation and encouraging industry trust.
Market Inertia and Transition Risks
Enterprises entrenched in ARM or x86 architectures may hesitate to switch due to existing tooling, developer familiarity, and support ecosystems. Mitigating this inertia requires clear ROI, phased migration strategies, and proven case studies.
Figure Explanation
The figure below illustrates the expansive and diverse RISC-V ecosystem as a solution to the challenges outlined above. It highlights active participation from IP providers, toolchain vendors, SoC developers, and commercial adopters. This broad engagement reinforces RISC-V’s global momentum and reflects the collaborative strength of its open-source foundation, which supports innovation across academia, startups, and enterprise applications.
Figure 3. The growing RISC-V ecosystem, covering IP providers, toolchains, SoC vendors, and development platforms. Image credit: Microchip Technology Inc., via All About Circuits (source).
Performance and Efficiency Comparison: RISC-V, ARM, and x86 Architectures
When evaluating performance across major processor families, x86 has excellent computational throughput and strong graphics capabilities, although it suffers from moderate power efficiency. ARM excels in energy-efficient design and performs well in high-performance embedded applications, delivering impressive graphics and data handling results. While still emerging, RISC-V offers commendable performance across computational, graphical, and data-intensive tasks. When customised appropriately, it also holds significant advantages in power efficiency due to its open and adaptable design.
Power Efficiency and Thermal Management
From a thermal and energy perspective, x86 systems typically consume more power and require sophisticated cooling, adding design and operational overhead. ARM processors, optimised for mobile and embedded devices, operate with lower thermal output and support a wide range of energy-saving states. RISC-V chips vary depending on implementation but can be configured for optimal power efficiency. This makes them highly competitive in power-sensitive environments like wearables and IoT, where minimal heat generation and power draw are crucial.
Scalability and Future Outlook
RISC-V’s open-source model firmly positions it for future scalability, driven by the growing demand for customised processors in emerging technologies like AI, IoT, and edge computing.
Growth Potential
Market adoption trends further highlight RISC-V’s accelerating momentum. RISC-V has already demonstrated rapid growth in embedded systems, outpacing x86 and emerging as a credible alternative to ARM. While ARM remains dominant in mobile devices, RISC-V is gaining traction with increasing support for smartphone SoCs. In data centres, x86 still dominates, yet RISC-V shows potential, especially in custom accelerators. For IoT, RISC-V’s open-source flexibility and power efficiency make it a front-runner for future deployments, outperforming both x86 and ARM in adaptability and cost-efficiency.
What Engineers and Businesses Should Do Next
Evaluate Strategic Fit
Conduct in-depth feasibility studies to determine how RISC-V aligns with your technical and business goals. Consider both short-term integration needs and long-term potential for differentiation.
Invest in Skills and Tools
Upskill your engineering teams through targeted training, workshops, and webinars. Equip them with verification frameworks and toolchains optimised for RISC-V development and compliance.
Engage in Ecosystem Collaboration
Actively participate in RISC-V forums, open-source initiatives, and standardisation efforts. These collaborations foster innovation, enhance internal capabilities, and position your organisation as a thought leader.
Bridge Software Ecosystem Gaps
Proactively address software readiness by investing in internal development, supporting RISC-V-compatible toolchains, or partnering with established vendors. This ensures smoother integration and faster time to market.
Manage Transition Risks
Adopt phased implementation strategies, such as hybrid RISC-V/ARM designs or pilot projects. Prepare contingency plans to minimise operational risk during migration and de-risk full adoption.
Conclusion
RISC-V architectures provide opportunities and practical implementation challenges. Its flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and strategic neutrality position it as a viable, forward-looking alternative to legacy ISAs. A comprehensive understanding of its ecosystem, advantages, and barriers ensures successful industry adoption.
Alpinum specialises in FPGA prototyping and verification solutions, enabling efficient and reliable adoption of RISC-V technologies.
Ready to Explore Further?
Discover how Alpinum can support your next FPGA or verification project. Contact our experts today for personalised guidance and industry-leading solutions tailored to your needs.
Frequently Asked Questions About RISC-V
Q1. What makes RISC-V different from ARM and x86?
RISC-V stands out as an open-source instruction set architecture (ISA), offering greater customisability than ARM or x86. Unlike ARM (which requires licensing) and x86 (which is tightly controlled by Intel and AMD), RISC-V allows developers to modify and extend the ISA freely, making it ideal for tailored designs across applications from IoT to data centres.
Q2. Why is RISC-V considered a disruptive technology?
RISC-V disrupts the status quo by eliminating licensing costs and enabling rapid innovation through its modular design. It lowers the barrier to entry for startups and research institutions, provides geopolitical neutrality, and empowers global hardware diversity. This is particularly impactful in areas where ARM has historically dominated.
Q3. What are the key challenges of adopting RISC-V?
Adopting RISC-V poses challenges such as:
- Complex verification processes due to extensive customisation
- A less mature software ecosystem compared to ARM
- The risk of ecosystem fragmentation without strong standardisation
- The need for skilled engineering teams and advanced toolchains
However, ongoing industry efforts mitigate these barriers through collaborative standards and tooling advancements.
Q4. How mature is the RISC-V software ecosystem?
While not as established as ARM’s, the RISC-V ecosystem has grown rapidly in recent years. Major players like SiFive, Andes, and Codasip contribute to toolchain development, and operating systems such as Linux and FreeRTOS now support RISC-V. Continued investment is expanding compiler support, drivers, and development environments.
Q5. Is RISC-V suitable for commercial products?
Yes. RISC-V is already used in commercial applications, from microcontrollers in IoT devices to AI accelerators and edge computing platforms. Its flexibility allows companies to build application-specific processors while maintaining cost efficiency and security.
Q6. How does RISC-V benefit semiconductor engineers?
RISC-V empowers semiconductor engineers to design processors tightly aligned to performance, power, and security needs. The open ISA model facilitates deeper architectural experimentation and accelerates time-to-market by removing licensing roadblocks. It’s a strategic tool for those focusing on FPGA, SoC, and ASIC innovation.
Q7. Will RISC-V replace ARM or x86?
RISC-V is unlikely to replace ARM or x86 entirely in the short term. However, it is poised to take a significant share in specific markets such as embedded systems, edge computing, and AI accelerators. Over time, RISC-V’s growth trajectory suggests it will become a standard option in processor design portfolios.
Q8. How can businesses start adopting RISC-V?
Businesses can begin by:
- Evaluating use cases where custom silicon offers a competitive advantage
- Training engineering teams in RISC-V design and verification (see https://alpinumconsulting.com/services/training/)
- Collaborating with RISC-V International and open-source communities
- Partnering with firms like Alpinum for RISC-V core and SoC development
